Current Situation and Challenges in Vitreous Substitutes
Files
Self archived version
published versionDate
2021Author(s)
Unique identifier
10.1002/mabi.202100066Metadata
Show full item recordMore information
Self-archived item
Citation
Mondelo-García, C. Bandín-Vilar, E. García-Quintanilla, L. Castro-Balado, A. Del Amo, EM. Gil-Martínez, M. Blanco-Teijeiro, MJ. González-Barcia, M. Zarra-Ferro, I. Fernández-Ferreiro, A. Otero-Espinar, FJ. (2021). Current Situation and Challenges in Vitreous Substitutes. Macromolecular bioscience, 21 (8) , 2100066. 10.1002/mabi.202100066.Rights
Abstract
Vitreo-retinal disorders constitute a significant portion of treatable ocular diseases. These pathologies often require vitreo-retinal surgery and, as a consequence, the use of vitreous substitutes. Nowadays, the vitreous substitutes that are used in clinical practice are mainly divided into gases (air, SF6, C2F6, C3F8) and liquids (perfluorocarbon liquids, silicone oils, and heavy silicone oils). There are specific advantages and drawbacks to each of these, which determine their clinical indications. However, developing the ideal biomaterial for vitreous substitution continues to be one of the most important challenges in ophthalmology, and a multidisciplinary approach is required. In this sense, recent research has focused on the development of biocompatible, biodegradable, and injectable hydrogels (natural, synthetic, and smart), which also act as medium and long-term internal tamponade agents. This comprehensive review aims to cover the main characteristics and indications for use of the extensive range of vitreous substitutes that are currently used in clinical practice, before going on to describe the hydrogels that have been developed recently and which have emerged as promising biomaterials for vitreous substitution.
Keywords
Link to the original item
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mabi.202100066Publisher
WileyCollections
- Terveystieteiden tiedekunta [1793]