Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTong T
dc.contributor.authorLedig C
dc.contributor.authorGuerrero R
dc.contributor.authorSchuh A
dc.contributor.authorKoikkalainen J
dc.contributor.authorTolonen A
dc.contributor.authorRhodius H
dc.contributor.authorBarkhof F
dc.contributor.authorTijms B
dc.contributor.authorLemstra AW
dc.contributor.authorSoininen H
dc.contributor.authorRemes AM
dc.contributor.authorWaldemar G
dc.contributor.authorHasselbalch S
dc.contributor.authorMecocci P
dc.contributor.authorBaroni M
dc.contributor.authorLötjönen J
dc.contributor.authorFlier WV
dc.contributor.authorRueckert D
dc.date.accessioned2017-08-09T07:18:04Z
dc.date.available2017-08-09T07:18:04Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.urihttps://erepo.uef.fi/handle/123456789/3714
dc.description.abstractDifferentiating between different types of neurodegenerative diseases is not only crucial in clinical practice when treatment decisions have to be made, but also has a significant potential for the enrichment of clinical trials. The purpose of this study is to develop a classification framework for distinguishing the four most common neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer's disease, frontotemporal lobe degeneration, Dementia with Lewy bodies and vascular dementia, as well as patients with subjective memory complaints. Different biomarkers including features from images (volume features, region-wise grading features) and non-imaging features (CSF measures) were extracted for each subject. In clinical practice, the prevalence of different dementia types is imbalanced, posing challenges for learning an effective classification model. Therefore, we propose the use of the RUSBoost algorithm in order to train classifiers and to handle the class imbalance training problem. Furthermore, a multi-class feature selection method based on sparsity is integrated into the proposed framework to improve the classification performance. It also provides a way for investigating the importance of different features and regions. Using a dataset of 500 subjects, the proposed framework achieved a high accuracy of 75.2% with a balanced accuracy of 69.3% for the five-class classification using ten-fold cross validation, which is significantly better than the results using support vector machine or random forest, demonstrating the feasibility of the proposed framework to support clinical decision making.en
dc.language.isoENen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesNEUROIMAGE: CLINICALen
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2017.06.012en
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 4.0
dc.subjectNeurodegenerative diseasesen
dc.subjectDifferential diagnosisen
dc.subjectMRIen
dc.subjectDementiaen
dc.subjectImbalance learningen
dc.subjectMulti-class feature selectionen
dc.titleFive-class differential diagnostics of neurodegenerative diseases using random undersampling boostingen
dc.description.versionpublished versionen
dc.contributor.departmentSchool of Medicine / Clinical Medicineen
uef.solecris.id48146012en
dc.type.publicationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleen
dc.relation.projectidinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/FP7-ICT/611005/EU/From Patient Data to Clinical Diagnosis in Neurodegenerative Diseases/PredictNDen
dc.relation.doi10.1016/j.nicl.2017.06.012en
dc.description.reviewstatuspeerRevieweden
dc.format.pagerange613-624en
dc.relation.issn2213-1582en
dc.relation.volume15en
dc.rights.accesslevelopenAccessen
dc.type.okmA1en
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionen
dc.rights.copyright© Authors
dc.type.displayTypearticleen
dc.type.displayTypeartikkelifi
dc.rights.urlhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record