• English
    • suomi
  • English 
    • English
    • suomi
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Artikkelit
  • Terveystieteiden tiedekunta
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Artikkelit
  • Terveystieteiden tiedekunta
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Does Implementation Follow Design? A Case Study of a Workplace Health Promotion Program Using the 4-S Program Design and the PIPE Impact Metric Evaluation Models

Thumbnail
View/Open
Article (349.7Kb)
Self archived version
published version
Date
2017
Author
Äikäs Antti Hermanni
Pronk Nicolaas P
Hirvensalo Mirja Hannele
Absetz Pilvikki
Unique identifier
10.1097/JOM.0000000000001067
Metadata
Show full item record
More information
Research Database SoleCris

Self-archived article

Citation
Äikäs Antti Hermanni. Pronk Nicolaas P. Hirvensalo Mirja Hannele. Absetz Pilvikki. (2017). Does Implementation Follow Design? A Case Study of a Workplace Health Promotion Program Using the 4-S Program Design and the PIPE Impact Metric Evaluation Models.  JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 59 (8) , 752-760. 10.1097/JOM.0000000000001067.
Rights
© American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
Licensed under
CC BY-NC-ND https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to describe the content of a multiyear market-based workplace health promotion (WHP) program and to evaluate design and implementation processes in a real-world setting.

Methods: Data was collected from the databases of the employer and the service provider. It was classified using the 4-S (Size, Scope, Scalability, and Sustainability) and PIPE Impact Metric (Penetration, Implementation) models. Data analysis utilized both qualitative and quantitative methods.

Results: Program design covered well the evidence-informed best practices except for clear path toward sustainability, cooperation with occupational health care, and support from middle-management supervisors. The penetration rate among participants was high (99%) and majority (81%) of services were implemented as designed.

Conclusion: Study findings indicate that WHP market would benefit the use of evidence-based design principles and tendentious decisions to anticipate a long-term implementation process already during the planning phase.

URI
https://erepo.uef.fi/handle/123456789/5131
Link to the original item
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000001067
Publisher
Wiley-Blackwell
Collections
  • Terveystieteiden tiedekunta
University of Eastern Finland
OpenAccess
eRepo
erepo@uef.fi
Send Feedback
OpenUEF
Service provided by
the University of Eastern Finland Library
Library web pages
Twitter
Facebook
Youtube
Library blog
 

Browse

All of the ArchiveResource types & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

My Account

Login
University of Eastern Finland
OpenAccess
eRepo
erepo@uef.fi
Send Feedback
OpenUEF
Service provided by
the University of Eastern Finland Library
Library web pages
Twitter
Facebook
Youtube
Library blog