• English
    • suomi
  • English 
    • English
    • suomi
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Artikkelit
  • Yhteiskuntatieteiden ja kauppatieteiden tiedekunta
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Artikkelit
  • Yhteiskuntatieteiden ja kauppatieteiden tiedekunta
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Assessing the effects of price regulation and freedom of choice on quality: evidence from the physiotherapy market

Thumbnail
View/Open
Article (907.2Kb)
Self archived version
published version
Date
2017
Author
Pekola Piia
Linnosmaa Ismo
Mikkola Hennamari
Unique identifier
10.1186/s13561-017-0158-2
Metadata
Show full item record
More information
Research Database SoleCris

Self-archived article

Citation
Pekola Piia. Linnosmaa Ismo. Mikkola Hennamari. (2017). Assessing the effects of price regulation and freedom of choice on quality: evidence from the physiotherapy market.  Health Economics Review, 7, 25. 10.1186/s13561-017-0158-2.
Rights
© Authors
Licensed under
CC BY http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Abstract

In health care, many aspects of the delivery of services are subject to regulation. Often the purpose of the regulated health care system is to encourage providers to keep costs down without skimping on quality. The purpose of this paper is to analyse the effect of price regulation and free choice on quality in physiotherapy organised by the Social Insurance Institution of Finland for the disabled individuals.

We use the difference-in-differences method in our effort to isolate the effect of the regulation and for this task we have defined the regulated and non-regulated firms and their quality before and after the regulation. The variables needed in the econometric modelling were collected from several registers as well as by carrying out questionnaires on the firms.

We show that price regulation decreased quality in physiotherapy statistically significantly and the mechanism was unable to incentivise firms to invest in quality. Most likely, our results are caused by cost reduction associated with price regulation. It seems that cost reduction was carried out through quality reductions in physiotherapy instead of increasing productivity. The result is sensible because comparable quality information is not published to support patient choice in this sector.

Subjects
Competitive bidding   Financial incentives   Physiotherapy   Quality   Regulation   Service voucher   
URI
https://erepo.uef.fi/handle/123456789/5807
Link to the original item
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13561-017-0158-2
Publisher
Springer Nature
Collections
  • Yhteiskuntatieteiden ja kauppatieteiden tiedekunta
University of Eastern Finland
OpenAccess
eRepo
erepo@uef.fi
Send Feedback
OpenUEF
Service provided by
the University of Eastern Finland Library
Library web pages
Twitter
Facebook
Youtube
Library blog
 

Browse

All of the ArchiveResource types & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

My Account

Login
University of Eastern Finland
OpenAccess
eRepo
erepo@uef.fi
Send Feedback
OpenUEF
Service provided by
the University of Eastern Finland Library
Library web pages
Twitter
Facebook
Youtube
Library blog