Comparison of two models for serious games analysis
Date
2019-02-07Author(s)
Carvalho, M. B.
Unique identifier
http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.17026/dans-zeg-uxphMetadata
Show full item recordResearch data
Citation
Carvalho, M. B.. , Comparison of two models for serious games analysis, 2019, http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.17026/dans-zeg-uxph.Licensed under
Abstract
In this study, we investigated users' perception of the usability and usefulness of two models for educational serious games analysis: Activity Theory-based Model of Serious Games (ATMSG) and Learning Mechanics–Game Mechanics (LM–GM). The goal was to obtain early user feedback on ATMSG in order to address issues, particularly on usability, before proceeding with more extensive user testing.