Skip to main contentSkip to search and navigation

UEF eREPOSITORY

    • English
    • suomi
  • English 
    • English
    • suomi
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Artikkelit
  • Luonnontieteiden ja metsätieteiden tiedekunta
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Artikkelit
  • Luonnontieteiden ja metsätieteiden tiedekunta
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Modelling of uncertainties in ultrasound sensor locations in photoacoustic tomography

Thumbnail
Files
Article (958.9Kb)
Self archived version
published version
Date
2020
Author(s)
Sahlström, Teemu
Pulkkinen, Aki
Tick, Jenni
Leskinen, Jarkko
Tarvainen, Tanja
Unique identifier
10.1117/12.2543024
Metadata
Show full item record
More information
Research Database SoleCris

Self-archived article

Citation
Sahlström, Teemu. Pulkkinen, Aki. Tick, Jenni. Leskinen, Jarkko. Tarvainen, Tanja. (2020). Modelling of uncertainties in ultrasound sensor locations in photoacoustic tomography.  Photons Plus Ultrasound: Imaging and Sensing 2020, 11240, 112402L. 10.1117/12.2543024.
Rights
© Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE)
Licensed under
All rights reserved
Abstract

Photoacoustic tomography (PAT) is an imaging modality developed during the past few decades. In the inverse problem of PAT, the aim is to estimate the spatial distribution of an initial pressure p0 generated by the photoacoustic effect, when photoacoustic time-series pt measured on the boundary of the imaged target are given. To produce accurate photoacoustic images, the forward model linking p0 to pt has to model the measurement setup and the underlying physics to a sufficient accuracy. Use of an inaccurate model can lead to significant errors in the solution of the inverse problem. In this work, we study the effect and compensation of modelling errors due to uncertainties in ultrasound sensor locations in PAT using Bayesian approximation error modelling. The approach is evaluated with simulated and experimental data using various levels of measurement noise, uncertainties in sensor locations and varying sensor geometries. The results indicate that even small errors in the modelling of ultrasound sensor locations can lead to large errors in the solution of the inverse problem. Furthermore, the magnitude of these errors is affected by the amount of measurement noise and the measurement The modelling errors can, however, be well compensated by the approximation error modelling.

URI
https://erepo.uef.fi/handle/123456789/8056
Link to the original item
http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.2543024
Publisher
SPIE
Collections
  • Luonnontieteiden ja metsätieteiden tiedekunta [1123]
University of Eastern Finland
OpenAccess
eRepo
erepo@uef.fi
UEF Open Science
Accessibility in eRepo
Service provided by
the University of Eastern Finland Library
Library web pages
Twitter
Facebook
Youtube
Library blog
 sitemap
Search

Browse

All of the ArchiveResource types & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsFacultyDepartmentFull organizationSeriesMain subjectThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsFacultyDepartmentFull organizationSeriesMain subject

My Account

Login
University of Eastern Finland
OpenAccess
eRepo
erepo@uef.fi
UEF Open Science
Accessibility in eRepo
Service provided by
the University of Eastern Finland Library
Library web pages
Twitter
Facebook
Youtube
Library blog
 sitemap