International study of childhood leukemia in residences near electrical transformer rooms
Files
Self archived version
published versionDate
2024Unique identifier
10.1016/j.envres.2024.118459Metadata
Show full item recordMore information
Self-archived item
Citation
Crespi, Catherine M.. Sudan, Madhuri. Juutilainen, Jukka. Roivainen, Päivi. Hareuveny, Ronen. Huss, Anke. Kandel, Shaiela. Karim-Kos, Henrike E.. Thuróczy, György. Jakab, Zsuzsanna. Spycher, Ben D.. Flueckiger, Benjamin. Vermeulen, Roel. Vergara, Ximena. Kheifets, Leeka. (2024). International study of childhood leukemia in residences near electrical transformer rooms. Environmental research, 249, 118459. 10.1016/j.envres.2024.118459.Rights
Licensed under
Abstract
Objectives
New epidemiologic approaches are needed to reduce the scientific uncertainty surrounding the association between extremely low frequency magnetic fields (ELF-MF) and childhood leukemia. While most previous studies focused on power lines, the Transformer Exposure study sought to assess this association using a multi-country study of children who had lived in buildings with built-in electrical transformers. ELF-MF in apartments above built-in transformers can be 5 times higher than in other apartments in the same building. This novel study design aimed to maximize the inclusion of highly exposed children while minimising the potential for selection bias.
Methods
We assessed associations between residential proximity to transformers and risk of childhood leukemia using registry based matched case-control data collected in five countries. Exposure was based on the location of the subject's apartment relative to the transformer, coded as high (above or adjacent to transformer), intermediate (same floor as apartments in high category), or unexposed (other apartments). Relative risk (RR) for childhood leukemia was estimated using conditional logistic and mixed logistic regression with a random effect for case-control set.
Results
Data pooling across countries yielded 16 intermediate and 3 highly exposed cases. RRs were 1.0 (95% CI: 0.5, 1.9) for intermediate and 1.1 (95% CI: 0.3, 3.8) for high exposure in the conditional logistic model. In the mixed logistic model, RRs were 1.4 (95% CI: 0.8, 2.5) for intermediate and 1.3 (95% CI: 0.4, 4.4) for high. Data of the most influential country showed RRs of 1.1 (95% CI: 0.5, 2.4) and 1.7 (95% CI: 0.4, 7.2) for intermediate (8 cases) and high (2 cases) exposure.
Discussion
Overall, evidence for an elevated risk was weak. However, small numbers and wide confidence intervals preclude strong conclusions and a risk of the magnitude observed in power line studies cannot be excluded.
