A Brief Survey on Six Basic and Reduced eHealth Indicators in Seven Countries in 2017
Self archived versionpublished version
MetadataShow full item record
CitationHaux, R. Ammenwerth, E. Koch, S. Lehmann, CU. Park, HA. Saranto, K. Wong, CP. (2018). A Brief Survey on Six Basic and Reduced eHealth Indicators in Seven Countries in 2017. Applied clinical informatics, 9 (3) , 704-713. 10.1055/s-0038-1669458.
Background Holistic, ubiquitous support of patient-centered health care (eHealth) at all health care institutions and in patients' homes through information processing is increasingly supplementing institution-centered care. While eHealth indicators may measure the transition from institution-centered (e.g., hospital-centered) information processing to patient-centered information processing, collecting relevant and timely data for such indicators has been difficult.
Objectives This article aims to design some basic eHealth indicators, which are easily collected and measure how well information processing supports holistic patient-centered health care, and to evaluate penetrance of patient-centered health as measured by the indicators internationally via an expert survey.
Methods We identified six basic indicators that measure access of health care professionals, patients, and caregivers to the patient's health record data and the ability of providers, patients, and caregivers to add information in the patient's record. In a survey of international informatics experts, these indicators' penetrance were evaluated for Austria, Finland, Germany, Hong Kong, South Korea, Sweden, and the United States in the summer of 2017.
Results The eHealth status measured by the indicators varied significantly between these seven countries. In Finland, most practices measured by the indicators were fully implemented whereas in Germany only one practice was partially realized.
Conclusion Progress in the implementation of practices that support patient-centered care could mainly be observed in those countries where the “political will” focused on achieving patient-centered care as opposed to an emphasis on institution-centered care. The six eHealth indicators seem to be useful for measuring national progress in patient-centered care. Future work will extend the number of countries analyzed.
Subjectshealth information exchanges disease management (general) health information systems patient-centered care connected health health care quality of care international comparison
Link to the original itemhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1669458
PublisherGeorg Thieme Verlag KG
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Use of oral health services and perceived oral health after the oral health care reform introduced during 2001-2002 : the more comprehensive public coverage of oral health care, the lower socioeconomic inequalities? Raittio, Eero (Itä-Suomen yliopisto; University of Eastern Finland, 2016)info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
Health development : a study of the determinants of health and the distribution of perceived health in Afghanistan, Armenia and the Russian Federation Paul, Pavitra (Itä-Suomen yliopisto; University of Eastern Finland, 2016)info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
Who needs the sociology of health and illness? A new agenda for responsive and interdisciplinary sociology of health and medicine Karvonen, Sakari; Kestilä, Laura; Mäki-Opas, Tomi (Frontiers Media SA, 2018)Health and medicine are key areas of sociological specialization, but in the face of rapid global challenges, they are changing. The need for change is becoming more and more urgent and the relevance of some of the traditional ...Tieteelliset aikakauslehtiartikkelit