Conservation Sovereignty and Biodiversity
![Thumbnail](/bitstream/handle/123456789/7654/15616330562001767703.pdf.jpg?sequence=4&isAllowed=y)
Files
Self archived version
published versionDate
2019Author(s)
Unique identifier
10.1007/978-3-030-10991-2_21Metadata
Show full item recordMore information
Self-archived item
Citation
Oksanen, Markku. Vuorisalo, Timo. (2019). Conservation Sovereignty and Biodiversity. From Assessing to Conserving Biodiversity, 24, 435-452. 10.1007/978-3-030-10991-2_21.Rights
Abstract
Many key concepts in conservation biology such as ‘endangered species’ and ‘natural’ or ‘historic range’ are universalistic, nation-blind and do not implicate the existence of geopolitical borders and sovereign states. However, it is impossible to consider biodiversity conservation without any reference to sovereign states. Consequently, the units of biodiversity and their ranges transform into legal concepts and categories. This paper explores the area that results from this transformation of the universalist idea into national policy targets. Conservation sovereignty denotes to right of each state to design and carry out its own conservation policies. To illustrate the problematic nature of conservation sovereignty, the paper focuses on two cases where the borders and the state play the key role: (1) the global division of conservation labour and (2) assisted migration. All in all, this paper takes a critical look upon the anomalies in universalism and conservation sovereignty.