Masculinizing chest-wall surgeries in transgender patients, a retrospective single-center study
Files
Self archived version
published versionDate
2024Author(s)
Unique identifier
10.1016/j.anplas.2023.09.008Metadata
Show full item recordMore information
Self-archived item
Citation
Makkonen, M. Myllykangas, HM. Kaarela, O. Nuutinen, H. (2024). Masculinizing chest-wall surgeries in transgender patients, a retrospective single-center study. Annales de chirurgie plastique esthetique, 69 (2) , 131-135. 10.1016/j.anplas.2023.09.008.Rights
Abstract
Introduction
Masculinizing chest-wall contouring surgery is an important surgical intervention for most transmasculine patients; a vast improvement in quality of life for this group of patients has been documented as a result of receiving surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of such surgeries performed at our university hospital between 2008 and 2020, as well as the current quality of life of the patients.
Methods
All 16 patients operated between 2008 and 2020 were sent a questionnaire consisting of both BREAST-Q and BODY-Q modules, considered fitting for our study purposes, as well as the BECK Depression Index and a short two-question form with space for feedback. Patients were divided into groups called double incision (DI) and periareolar (PA) depending on the surgical technique used.
Results
We found an overall complication percentage of 31.3%, with the DI group scoring 33.3% and PA 28.6%, while secondary aesthetic corrections were necessary for 50% of all patients. The questionnaires yielded 6 responses (37.5%). Participants rated on a scale of 1 to 10 their willingness to undergo the operation again if given the choice; the DI group averaged 10/10, and the PA group 9/10, despite the statistically significant complication and correction rates.
Conclusions
Masculinizing chest-wall contouring surgery has significant complication risks. In our study, frequency of complications did not appear to depend on the surgical technique used. Additionally, the complication rates found in our low volume centre seem to be comparable with those reported from bigger units.
Link to the original item
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anplas.2023.09.008Publisher
Elsevier Masson SASCollections
- Terveystieteiden tiedekunta [1793]